The 'sceptic' vs 'believer' debate in relation to the
paranormal, God and religion has become very polarised. I feel this limits both
sides of the argument with few minds being converted either way. It makes it
difficult to occupy the middle ground. One of the reasons I set up the Parapsychology
Society at Manchester Metropolitan University was to bring about constructive
debate on the paranormal.
Psychology students are a sceptical bunch and rightly so.
The majority in the scientific community are atheists. A study in the US found
that only 40% of prominent scientists believed in a God compared 70-80% in the
general population. This shouldn’t be surprising as a truly enquiring mind will
assess all the information and evidence for God and the paranormal is sketchy
at best. So a large cohort of people will therefore reject it out of
hand.
In the UK general levels of belief in God are lower at 35-40% (BBC and
YouGov, 2004) showing there are large cultural differences. Similar results are
found in levels of paranormal belief. 3 in 4 Americans believe at least one
paranormal belief. The highest being Extra Sensory Perception (ESP) and haunted
houses. The same is true in the UK, although gender played more of a role with
higher numbers of women endorsing certain items (astrology, contacting the dead)
(Gallup, 2005).
It is an unfortunate
by-product of this that believers are sometimes framed as uneducated,
misinformed or irrational. We often hear the phrase: ‘An
extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof’ (Truzzi, 1978:11).It
is at this point that we reach an impasse. Believers cannot provide sufficient
evidence for their claims and sceptics will not accept anecdotal or
introspective accounts. So where do we go from here?
I think the sceptical community can be commended for
promoting critical thought. “There is a distinct difference between having an open mind and having a
hole in your head from which your brain leaks out.” (James Randi). However,
some take it further and seek to convert minds, similar to a religion (?).
There is a great deal of hope and faith invested in these beliefs which needs
to be acknowledged. I would like there to be ghosts and an afterlife, I just
don't think there is. Likewise, the paranormal community must concede that they
are unlikely to get the evidence needed to change sceptical minds.
Some movement within these positions could facilitate
constructive debate. The furore on the Dawkins/Church of England prayer debate
is a case in point. I hope the work I have done over the past two years with
the parapsychology society, talking to people about their paranormal
experiences, hosting events, my Twitter and Blog will influence this in some
small way. I'm coming to the end of my studies now but will try and carry on
fighting the good fight for a non-threatening, liberal, middle ground - how
very British!
Scott, Eugenie.
"Do Scientists Really Reject God?: New Poll Contradicts Earlier
Ones". Reports of the National Center for Science Education. National
Center for Science Education.
"More Than 9 in 10
Americans Continue to Believe in God". (2011) Gallup.com
“What The World
Thinks Of God" . (2004) BBC News
"Telegraph
YouGov poll". (2004) The Daily Telegraph
Gallup Poll – USA,
Canada and Britain (2005)
Truzzi, M. (1978)
‘On the extraordinary: An attempt at clarification’ Zetetic Scholar, 1, (1),
pp.11-22